Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > This explains for why 'broken' must use a subprocess, but there is > nothing stopping 'dirty' from also using a subprocess, right? It > currently uses an in-process index refresh but it _could_ be a > subprocess too. Correct, except that it does not make sense to do any and all things that you _could_ do. So...
