Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> However, this bit means that I shouldn't entirely trust its output: >> >>> The output emitted when this option is used is subject to change, and so is its interaction with other options (unless explicitly documented). >> >> What is my best course of action? > > I'd encourage proposing a patch to make the documentation say what you > wish it said. I do not think that was what Pavel wanted to get suggestion on, but it is certainly something that would benefit not just a single person but other users ;-)
