On 27/06/24 21:17, Junio C Hamano wrote: > to avoid triggering an in-process error and instead run an > equivalent "update-index --refresh" via the run_command() interface, > so that we can catch potential errors. Thanks, I get it now.
On 27/06/24 21:17, Junio C Hamano wrote: > to avoid triggering an in-process error and instead run an > equivalent "update-index --refresh" via the run_command() interface, > so that we can catch potential errors. Thanks, I get it now.