Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Darcy's "date underflow fix" topic, final reroll

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio

On 26/06/2024 00:12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
So it has been some time since we discussed this topic.  Let's clean
up the messy "SQUASH???" patches I had to queue on top of the main
patch to keep the CI working and make them into a preliminary patch.

The tree at the end of the series is identical to what has been
queued in 'seen' for the past few weeks.  The only difference is
that we first lay groundwork to skip certain time-parsing tests on
32-bit systems first, and then use Darcy's patch with minimum
adjustments for 32-bit systems.

I've had a read through this verison and I don't have anything to add to Eric's comments.

Best Wishes

Phillip


Darcy Burke (1):
   date: detect underflow/overflow when parsing dates with timezone offset

Junio C Hamano (1):
   t0006: simplify prerequisites

  date.c          | 12 +++++++++++-
  t/t0006-date.sh | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux