Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 10:26:58PM GMT, Eric Wong wrote: > > > That would be redundant with the message-id. Unfortunately, this doesn't solve > > > the problem of how to reliably map a commit to the patch from which it > > > originated, other than using the Message-ID: or Link: trailers. > > > > dfpre:, dfblob:, dfpost: search queries on lore seem to work... > > I've thought about that, but this is also not very reliable, at least not when > patch series are applied as fast-forwards, not merges. Unfortunately, some > projects enforce a flat history (glibc, gcc), with merges being specifically > not allowed -- which means dfblob matching is not going to match a lot of > commits. Yeha, my initial plan (way back around 2016 or 2017) was to use Subject; but I also forgot why I stopped with that idea :x Anyways, trying to add bs: (body+subject) to queries in addition to dfblob may prove useful: https://public-inbox.org/meta/20240616233532.574646-1-e@xxxxxxxxx/ Not sure if author + date is necessary...
