Re: [RFH] t9500 failing???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFH] t9500 failing???
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:09:02 -0700
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAO_smVh2yZRfs2vq2RKY=eLj8-0BgPierxksq376u=X-=pbKWA@mail.gmail.com> (Kyle Lippincott's message of "Wed, 12 Jun 2024 11:38:30 -0700")
References: <xmqqr0d2p1x3.fsf@gitster.g> <CAO_smVh2yZRfs2vq2RKY=eLj8-0BgPierxksq376u=X-=pbKWA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Kyle Lippincott <spectral@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> So my conclusion is that 4.62 is broken, and that newer versions are unbroken.

Thanks for digging.

References:
- [RFH] t9500 failing???
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: [RFH] t9500 failing???
  - From: Kyle Lippincott

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 14/16] mktree: optionally add to an existing tree
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/4] t5541: add test for rejecting a push due to packfile size
Previous by thread: Re: [RFH] t9500 failing???
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux