Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > The real bug that "-Og" would have been able to detect was reported by > Peff via [1]. In this case it wasn't "-Og" that detected it, but > Coverity did. But it would have been detected if we had a job that > compiled with "-Og". Thanks. It is curious that you singled out "-Og" here, but with the usual "-O2" optimization level, it does not seem to get noticed. > But now that I see the full picture of this with different compiler > options I have to agree that this is not really worth it. Especially not > given that Coverity is able to detect such cases, even though that only > happens retroactively after a topic has landed. > > Let's drop this experiment. OK, but let's keep the CFLAGS_APPEND one ;-)
