Re: With big repos and slower connections, git clone can be hard to work with

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(I'm probably not the person to answer fully. But I can say HTTPS Git clones from GitHub don't ever resume for me, if that's informative.)

On 6/8/24 9:00 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

One strategy people have worked on is for servers to point clients at
static packfiles (which _do_ remain byte-for-byte identical, and can be
resumed) to get some of the objects. But it requires some scheme on the
server side to decide when and how to create those packfiles. So while
there is support inside Git itself for this idea (both on the server and
client side), I don't know of any servers where it is in active use.

Didn't the bundle URL work originate at GitHub?  I thought this use
case was a reasonable match to the mechanism.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux