Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > We're unlikely to break existing workflows though if we name this > variable something like `OPTIMIZATION_LEVEL`. Yeah, being more explicit is always good. > We could also generalize this a bit and introduce `CFLAGS_APPEND` > instead. Optimization levels are last-one-wins anyway, so people can use > that to append their own flags without overriding existing values. It > would also mean that we can avoid repeating the CFLAGS that we already > have in our Makefile in our CI scripts. Yup, Peff's $(O) cannot serve as such, but my $(O) is already being used as such. Naming the variable that gives additional CFLAGS as such is probably a good way to go. Thanks.