Re: [PATCH v2] doc: imply that interactive.singleKey is disabled by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-06-01 00:21, Dragan Simic wrote:
On 2024-05-31 19:23, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Just checking, is there something left to be addressed for this patch,
before it can be considered to be pulled into the next branch?

Thanks for pinging, as these small things were on the back burner
while preparing for updates to maintenance tracks.

Apparently v2 cannot be pulled into the next branch, and I forgot if
I saw v3 already.  In general, unless I explicitly say there is no
need to resend (sometimes with conditions), I'd expect an updated
iteration sent to the list.

I see, but I'm not really sure is there need for the v3?  Maybe the
patch description could be tweaked a bit further, but I wasn't under
impression that you asked for that to be done?  Am I wrong there?

Any chances, please, to have a look at this?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux