On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 09:52:33AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > > > + > > +* git-restore(1) and git-switch(1) have been introduced as a replacement for > > + git-checkout(1). As git-checkout(1) is quite established, and as the benefit > > + of switching to git-restore(1) and git-switch(1) is contended, all three > > + commands will stay. > > "As a replacement" is probably a bit different from the truth [*], > but I suspect that the reason why they were introduced no longer has > much relevance. How about > > The features git-checkout(1) offers are covered by the pair of > commands git-restore(1) and git-switch(1). Because the use of > git-checkout(1) is still widespread, and it is not expected that > this will change anytime soon. > > or something (borrowing from your proposed log message)? Fair enough, let's add it like this. Thanks! Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
