On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 09:24:48AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > > +This is a living document as the environment surrounding the project changes > > +over time. An earlier decision to deprecate or change something may need to be > > +revisited from time to time. So do not take items on this list to mean "it is > > +settled, do not waste our time bringing it up again". > > But you are expected to be aware of past discussion, and if you are > not bringing anything new to the table, you are wasting our time. > Note that pointing out an old rationale no longer applies to today's > world still counts as a new datapoint in a renewed discussion. Yeah. I like Phillip's proposal here, which adds "If circumstances change" to the second sentence to clarify that we do not want to rehash the same arguments. Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
