Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] use the pager in 'add -p'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 10:11:49AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> By the way, although I personally do not have much sympathy to those
> who set it, in the presence of interactive.singleKey configuration
> variable, a command that takes optional argument may turn out to be
> a mistake, as the user cannot give the argument even if they wanted
> to, when the configuration variable is set to true.

Well spotted.

Perhaps we can do something like:

diff --git a/add-patch.c b/add-patch.c
index 5a586d1b9b..01525214f9 100644
--- a/add-patch.c
+++ b/add-patch.c
@@ -1685,8 +1685,17 @@ static int patch_update_file(struct add_p_state *s,
 		} else if (s->answer.buf[0] == 'p') {
 			rendered_hunk_index = -1;
 		} else if (ch == '|') {
+			strbuf_remove(&s->answer, 0, 1);
+			if (s->s.use_single_key && !s->answer.len) {
+				printf("%s", _("program? "));
+				fflush(stdout);
+				strbuf_getline(&s->answer, stdin);
+				strbuf_trim_trailing_newline(&s->answer);
+			}
 			rendered_hunk_index = -1;
-			pager = s->answer.buf + 1;
+			pager = s->answer.buf;
 		} else if (s->answer.buf[0] == '?') {
 			const char *p = _(help_patch_remainder), *eol = p;
 
I agree this needs to be addressed in this series.

I'd prefer to leave the feature of reusing the command, to another
series.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux