On 2024-05-29 16:29, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 09:50:43AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:
> Yeah, that's definitely better. Whether it's preferable over having it
> after the signature separator I don't know. I personally liked that
> version better, but can totally see why others may not like it.
I do not think anybody posted a version that writes inter/range diff
ater the signature mark.
No, I'm talking about the version that you hand crafted initially and
that kicked off this topic.
Ah, https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqh6ep1pwz.fsf_-_@gitster.g/ I
forgot all about it already ;-).
... I just don't have a strong preference between the old and
new formats by now. If you or others feel strongly I don't mind at all
if this patch lands.
Let's scrap it then. I do not think a single-patch topic happens
all that often anyway.
Hmm. Actually, I find it logical and I don't think it should be
scrapped.
As I wrote already, I find range diffs as really long footnotes, and
placing them at the end of "documents" seems like a logical choice to
me.
