Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Various memory leak fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 07:10:09PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > this is the second version of my patch series that fixes various memory
>> > leaks in Git. Changes compared to v1:
>> >
>> >   - t4153 and t7006 aren't marked as passing anymore. I thought they
>> >     pass because most of these tests were skipped because of a missing
>> >     TTY prerequisite both on my local machine, but also in our CI.
>> >
>> >   - Add another patch to install the Perl IO:Pty module on Alpine and
>> >     Ubuntu. This fulfills the TTY prerequisite and thus surfaces the
>> >     memory leaks in both of the above tests.
>> >
>> >   - Add another unit test for strvec that exercise replacing a string in
>> >     the strvec with a copy of itself.
>> >
>> >   - A bunch of commit message improvements.
>>
>> Looking very good.  This seems to reveal existing leaks when merged
>> to 'seen'; other topics that are not in 'master' may be introducing
>> these leaks.  I'll see if a trial merge to 'next' is leak-free (in
>> which case I'll merge it down to 'next') or there are other topics
>> in 'next' that are leaking (in which case we'll play by ear---either
>> mark the tests again as non-leak-free, or plug the leak if it seems
>> trivial).
>>
>>  https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/9231313414/job/25400998823
>>
>> says t1400-update-ref has many "stdin symref-update" things are
>> failing.
>
> Indeed. The following diff fixes the leak:
>
>     diff --git a/builtin/update-ref.c b/builtin/update-ref.c
>     index 7d2a419230..e54be9c429 100644
>     --- a/builtin/update-ref.c
>     +++ b/builtin/update-ref.c
>     @@ -130,6 +130,8 @@ static char *parse_next_arg(const char **next)
>
>         if (arg.len)
>             return strbuf_detach(&arg, NULL);
>     +
>     +	strbuf_release(&arg);
>         return NULL;
>      }
>
>
> Karthik is out of office this week, so you may want to add this as a
> "SQUASH???" commit on top of his topic branch to make "seen" pass.
>

Thanks Patrick. Indeed I'm a bit slow on my responses, since I'm on
vacation, but yeah, I too came about adding this as a fix.

I'll mostly check for all tests and send a new version based on this
series soon.

>> Also
>>
>>  https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/9231313414/job/25401102951
>>
>> shows that t1460-refs-migrate fails on Windows.
>
> Hm, this one is curious. There are no leak logs at all, and the exit
> code is 139. Might be SIGSEGV, indicating that something else is going
> on here than a memory leak.
>
> I'll investigate.
>
> Patrick

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux