Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] fetch-pack: expose fsckObjects configuration logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

>> +int fetch_pack_fsck_objects(void)
>> +{
>> +	fetch_pack_setup();
>> +
>> +	return fetch_fsck_objects >= 0
>> +	       ? fetch_fsck_objects
>> +	       : transfer_fsck_objects >= 0
>> +	       ? transfer_fsck_objects
>> +	       : 0;
>> +}
>
> ... can we maybe rewrite it to something more customary here? The
> following is way easier to read, at least for me.
>
> 	int fetch_pack_fsck_objects(void)
> 	{
> 		fetch_pack_setup();
> 		if (fetch_fsck_objects >= 0 ||
> 		    transfer_fsck_objects >= 0)
> 			return 1;
> 		return 0;
> 	}

But do they mean the same thing?  In a repository where

    [fetch] fsckobjects = no

is set, no matter what transfer.fsckobjects says (or left unspecified),
we want to return "no, we are not doing fsck".




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux