Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert defense-in-depth patches breaking Git LFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



brian m. carlson wrote:
> > proposal was to introduce a way to cross-check the SHA-256 of hooks that
> > _were_ written during a clone operation against a list of known-good ones.
> > Another alternative was to special-case Git LFS by matching the hooks'
> > contents against a regular expression that matches Git LFS' current
> > hooks'.
> 
> I have replied to those on the security list and to the general idea.  I
> don't think we should special-case Git LFS here.  That's antithetical to
> the long-standing ethos of the project.

I was surprised today to find that git-annex also triggers the hook
problem. In particular, a git clone that uses git-remote-annex can
cause several hooks to get created.

I think the hook check is already scheduled for reversion, but in case
not, here's another data point against hard-coding known-good hooks as a
solution.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux