On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 3:35 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 01:31:03PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 4:26 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > In other words, this version is a minimum viable product for migrating a > > > repository's ref storage format. It works alright for bare repos, which > > > typically have neither worktrees nor reflogs. > > > > Worktrees hanging off a bare repository is an explicitly supported > > use-case, and there are people who use and promote such an > > organization, so I'm not sure if "typically" is accurate these days. > > Anyhow, just a minor observation, probably not worth rewording, and > > certainly not worth a reroll. > > True enough. I would claim that most bare repositories out in the wild > do not have worktrees, mostly because they are used on the server side. > But in the end, quantity is rather irrelevant. I'll s/typically/often/ > to relax the statement a bit. Does that work for you? Yes, "often" works just fine.
