Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Wait. There is something fishy going on. > >> Range diff vs v1: >> 1: 1bc4cc3fc4 = 1: 1bc4cc3fc4 refs: accept symref values in `ref_transac... >>... >> 8: 4865707bda = 8: 4865707bda refs: remove `create_symref` and associated dead code >> 9: 4cb67dce7c ! 9: 2bbdeff798 refs: create and use `ref_update_ref_must_exist()` > ... > I am confused why we are seeing a total reroll of such an old topic. > > Also you have one more patch at the end. Neither the before or > after version of 9/9. > > Is this actually a single patch submission of 9/9 alone? Patches > 1-8/9 are all old ones that are in 'master' already. And then there is a mystery of this v2 being a 6-patch series. Perhpas a wrong range-diff was pasted into it? If this were truly a total reroll of the previous 8-patch series with an extra step appended to the end, it would have been a 9-patch series, not 6. Even puzzled...
