Re: Re* [PATCH] add-patch: response to unknown command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 08:52:14AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:
>
> > I'm a bit on the edge here. Is it really less confusing if we confront
> > the user with a command that they have never even provided in the first
> > place? They implicitly specified the first letter, only, but the user
> > first needs to be aware that we discard everything but the first letter
> > in the first place.
>
> I share your doubt.  If what the user said (e.g. "ues") when they
> wanted to say "yes", I find "You said 'u', which I do not understand"
> more confusiong than "You said 'ues', which I do not understand".

Same here. The below patch provides compelling reasoning and has my:

  Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Taylor




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux