Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > So, in short, I didn't see anything unexpected to see in these > branches. The "ci" fixes were already reviewed elsewhere (even > though there are slight deviations), so if people are OK with the 6 > patches in this thread, I would say we are good to go. Maybe I spoke a bit too early, and we may need to redo (not necessarily revert) f4aa8c8b as well.
