Re: [PATCH] Make git-clean a builtin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 01:14:32PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> [...]
> > +static int disabled = 1;
> 
> This means we are committed to make clean.requireForce default
> to true, which is fine by me.  I need to warn the users about
> this early.

Actually I don't care either way, but in my last rebase on next this
change was already made to git-clean.sh so I adjusted accordingly.

> > +static int show_only = 0;
> > +static int remove_directories = 0;
> > +static int quiet = 0;
> > +static int ignored = 0;
> > +static int ignored_only = 0;
> 
> Please do not explicitly initialize static variables to zero.

I realize that static variables will be automatically initialized to
zero so this is unnecessary, but is there some technical reason not to
initialize explicitly?  If the answer is simply a style preference that
is fine, I'm just here to learn.

Of course as already pointed out these don't actually need to be static
in the first place so I'll simply move them into cmd_clean().  This does
lead me to another question though.  Now that Dscho has converted my
patch to use parse-options, what is the best way to update my patch
while still giving credit to Dscho?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux