Re: [PATCH 3/3] ci: stop installing "gcc-13" for osx-gcc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 10:25:20AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 04:11:32AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:36:19PM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> [snip]
> > One can guess that scalar is in waitpid() waiting for git-fetch. But
> > what's fetch waiting on? The other side of upload-pack is dead.
> > According to lsof, it does have a unix socket open to fsmonitor. So
> > maybe it's trying to read there?
> 
> That was also my guess. I tried whether disabling fsmonitor via
> `core.fsmonitor=false` helps, but that did not seem to be the case.
> Either because it didn't have the desired effect, or because the root
> cause is not fsmonitor. No idea which of both it is.

The root cause actually is the fsmonitor. I was using your tmate hack to
SSH into one of the failed jobs, and there had been 7 instances of the
fsmonitor lurking. After killing all of them the job got unstuck and ran
to completion.

The reason why setting `core.fsmonitor=false` is ineffective is because
in "scalar.c" we always configure `core.fsmonitor=true` in the repo
config and thus override the setting. I was checking whether it would
make sense to defer enabling the fsmonitor until after the fetch and
checkout have concluded. But funny enough, the below patch caused the
pipeline to now hang deterministically.

Puzzled.

Patrick

diff --git a/scalar.c b/scalar.c
index 7234049a1b..67f85c7adc 100644
--- a/scalar.c
+++ b/scalar.c
@@ -178,13 +178,6 @@ static int set_recommended_config(int reconfigure)
                     config[i].key, config[i].value);
    }
 
-	if (have_fsmonitor_support()) {
-		struct scalar_config fsmonitor = { "core.fsmonitor", "true" };
-		if (set_scalar_config(&fsmonitor, reconfigure))
-			return error(_("could not configure %s=%s"),
-				     fsmonitor.key, fsmonitor.value);
-	}
-
    /*
     * The `log.excludeDecoration` setting is special because it allows
     * for multiple values.
@@ -539,6 +532,13 @@ static int cmd_clone(int argc, const char **argv)
    if (res)
        goto cleanup;
 
+	if (have_fsmonitor_support()) {
+		struct scalar_config fsmonitor = { "core.fsmonitor", "true" };
+		if (set_scalar_config(&fsmonitor, 0))
+			return error(_("could not configure %s=%s"),
+				     fsmonitor.key, fsmonitor.value);
+	}
+
    res = register_dir();
 
 cleanup:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux