Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> +static void debug_release(struct ref_store *refs)
>> +{
>> + struct debug_ref_store *drefs = (struct debug_ref_store *)refs;
>
> We should probably add a trace here, using `trace_printf_key()`
A totally ignorant question. Should we be adding more traces with
trace_* API instead of trace2_* API? If the latter aims to cover
superset of use cases the former did, I was hoping that we can
eventually deprecate the former, hence this question. Of course We
could add a compatiblity layer that emulates trace_* API with a thin
wrapper around trace2_* API, but if we do not add new callers, it
may still be feasible to directly migrate the callers to use trace2_
API without having to invent such compatibility wrappers.
