On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 02:44:09PM +0200, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> From: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
> index c2c9889466..6b724343fe 100644
> --- a/refs.c
> +++ b/refs.c
> @@ -1302,15 +1302,16 @@ int ref_transaction_update(struct ref_transaction *transaction,
> int ref_transaction_create(struct ref_transaction *transaction,
> const char *refname,
> const struct object_id *new_oid,
> + const char *new_target,
> unsigned int flags, const char *msg,
> struct strbuf *err)
> {
> - if (!new_oid || is_null_oid(new_oid)) {
> - strbuf_addf(err, "'%s' has a null OID", refname);
> + if ((!new_oid || is_null_oid(new_oid)) && !new_target) {
> + strbuf_addf(err, "'%s' has a null OID or no new target", refname);
> return 1;
> }
Shouldn't this be "'%s' has neither an OID nor a target"?
Also, we again miss `new_oid && new_target`.
> diff --git a/t/t0600-reffiles-backend.sh b/t/t0600-reffiles-backend.sh
> index a390cffc80..cc7e20431e 100755
> --- a/t/t0600-reffiles-backend.sh
> +++ b/t/t0600-reffiles-backend.sh
> @@ -468,4 +468,36 @@ test_expect_success POSIXPERM 'git reflog expire honors core.sharedRepository' '
> esac
> '
>
> +test_expect_success SYMLINKS 'symref transaction supports symlinks' '
> + test_when_finished "git symbolic-ref -d TESTSYMREFONE" &&
> + git update-ref refs/heads/new @ &&
> + test_config core.prefersymlinkrefs true &&
> + cat >stdin <<-EOF &&
> + start
> + symref-create TESTSYMREFONE refs/heads/new
Let's future proof this and create the ref with a name that matches our
root ref restrictions, like "TEST_SYMREF_HEAD". We do plan to enforce
those soonish, so these tests would break.
Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
