On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 03:38:47PM -0500, Justin Tobler wrote: > On 24/05/15 08:50AM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: [snip] > > The new behaviour is to include symbolic refs know, which aligns us > > s/know/now/ Fixed locally. I'll refrain from sending a new version just to fix this typo though. > > with the adapted terminology. Furthermore, files which look like > > root refs but aren't are now mark those as "broken". As broken refs > > are not surfaced by our tooling, this should not lead to a change in > > user-visible behaviour, but may cause us to emit warnings. This > > feels like the right thing to do as we would otherwise just silently > > ignore corrupted root refs completely. > > Is there an expected source of broken root refs? Or would it just be due > to bugs? Dangling symbolic refs are the only expected source. The fact that we did not include those here feels like a bug to me. Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
