Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] refs: root refs can be symbolic refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 08:35:52AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:

> > Yeah, and I'd expect that the more-strict check_refname_format() that I
> > proposed elsewhere would be in the same boat. The only reason I used the
> > "_syntax()" variant is that it was obviously wrong to do existence
> > checks there. Once those are gone, then naturally it should be able to
> > rely on is_root_ref() itself.
> This series hasn't been queued/merged yet, right? Do you plan to reroll
> it? I think that the changes in there are a good complementary addition
> to the clarifications in my patch series.

Correct, I don't think Junio picked it up. It needed a re-roll anyway,
so I'd plan to do it on top of your patches, assuming they are on track
to get merged (and it sounds like there are no real objections).


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux