Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] osxkeychain: lock for exclusive execution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you for the instruction about a log message. I'll follow it.

> Is this step still needed, though?

For solving the issue I originally had, just utilizing state[] to skip
"store" operations is enough.

Since the osxkeychain implementation doesn't seem to be aware that it
can run in parallel, I thought it would be better to leave this step in
case a similar problem occurs. If this reason is weak, I'll remove this
step.

Koji Nakamaru




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux