David Symonds wrote:
On 11/5/07, David Symonds <dsymonds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:[-s | --signoff] [<common diff options>] - [--start-number <n>] [--numbered-files] + [-n | --numbered-files | -N | --no-numbered] + [--start-number <n>]Now that I look at it again, it seems the long options look quite inconsistent. I think it should be either --numbered-files/--no-numbered-files or --numbered/--no-numbered. My preference is with the latter (for brevity), but that breaks backward-compatibility. Would you accept a patch that changed --numbered-files to --numbered, and kept the former as a synonym?
I thought files were always numbered, but the [PATCH m/n] wasn't. Have I missed something? If your --numbered-files is supposed to affect only file-numbering, I'd suggest *not* using --numbered, as it's ambiguous with "number-subject". -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
