Re: [PATCH 2/3] ci: avoid bare "gcc" for osx-gcc job

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kyle Lippincott <spectral@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 9:24 AM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On macOS, a bare "gcc" (without a version) will invoke a wrapper for
>> clang, not actual gcc. Even when gcc is installed via homebrew, that
>> only provides version-specific links in /usr/local/bin (like "gcc-13"),
>> and never a version-agnostic "gcc" wrapper.
>>
>> As far as I can tell, this has been the case for a long time, and this
>> osx-gcc job has largely been doing nothing.
>
> If it's been doing nothing (which I interpreted as "it's doing the
> same thing as osx-clang"), and we've not noticed any issues with that,
> do we need the job at all? Should we just rely on clang and not test
> with gcc on macOS, since it's not a compiler that's provided by the
> platform anymore?

A very tempting suggestion.  I do not see any problems with the
direction.

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux