Re: [PATCH 00/13] reftable: prepare for re-seekable iterators

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

> The below diff would be needed on top of what you currently have in
> `seen`. In any case though, I can also resend this topic with
> ps/reftable-write-options pulled in as a dependency. Please let me know
> your preference.

Is it "needed", in the sense that "without the fix what you posted
is broken in such and such ways", or is it "I think it is niceR to
have it on stack because this one instance does not have to be on
heap"?  To me, they look equivalent and I have no problems with the
"nicer" variant, but your "needed" makes me wonder if I am missing
some correctness invariants I am violating without realizing.

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux