On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 05:59:01PM +0200, Dragan Simic wrote: > Hello Patrick, > > On 2024-05-08 15:54, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > Okay, I see how that may make sense for some parts. I guess one of the > > motivations here is things like git-checkout(1) and git-switch(1) / > > git-restore(1)? > > As I wrote already, [1] I really see no reasons why git-switch(1) or > git-restore(1) should be deprecated. That would make zero sense to me. > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/git/3d84f2eac9b03eda814332d73b5d5ba6@xxxxxxxxxxx/ Note that the discussion here is the other way round: whether we want to eventually deprecate tools like git-checkout(1) that have newer replacements. Junio argues that there being a replacement is not by itself a good enough reason to eventually remove the old one, which I'm fine with. Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature