Re: [PATCH 0/3] more terse push output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>   - the 'ref is not up-to-date, maybe you need to push' message has gone
>     away in favor of the terse '[rejected] ... (non-fast forward)'. I
>     know there was some discussion recently of enhancing that message.
>     Is this perhaps too terse?

I kind of like this part.

I also like the part that stops mentioning the "pretend fetching
back" action.  This would mostly parrot the same set of refs for
people who do use the tracking branches anyway.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux