Hi Karthik! On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 9:37 AM Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello Ivan, > [snip] > > That's correct, my question was merely that we also have a > `refs_verify_refname_available` function call there and was wondering if > we somehow need to catch and propagate the same error from there. Like > you mentioned the way it is currently structured doesn't make that > possible. Ah I see, that makes sense. Thanks for the clarification and for the initial question!
