Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > See, the creation factor is described in the documentation as some fudge > factor, specified as a percentage. Without going through the actual > source code in detail, a question that pops up in my mind is why do we > need to use 999 or 9999 as the new default value? Shouldn't 99 or 100 > be good enough instead, if it's a percentage? I'd assume that the same > question might be asked by other Git users. It is very much deliberate to choose a value beyond 100. Setting the value to such a large value was designed to force somebody to ask that question: "what does the value mean?" [*], and in a sense it already has achieved one half of its objective ;-). We never had an satisfactory update to the range-diff documentation when we discussed this parameter in the past. It was stated that the unit to express the value for creation-factor was called "percent", but it seems that nobody had a good explanation that can be given to a layperson what that percent means (e.g., what is it relative to? what it means to have that value at 100% as opposed to say 50%?). Somebody should come up with an easy-to-understand explanation suitable for users after reading and digesting the overly technical "algorithm" section of the manual, and forcing ourselves to do a good job at it is the other half of its objective. [Footnote] * Having more than 100 as a value that is measured in "percent" is not unusual, by the way. You can zoom into a picture at magnification level of 400%, for example.
