Hi Karthik On 06/05/2024 12:22, Karthik Nayak wrote:
That's correct. I think testing that _currently_ would require us to probably expose and test via the unit testing library. I plan to follow this patch series soon with the symref-* ones. While that's not the best argument for not having full test coverage, I hope it is an OK state to be since that path has no users as of this point.
That seems reasonable - we have good test coverage for the code we're currently using and you're clearly committed to adding tests for the rest when you extend "git update-ref" to accommodate symrefs.
Thanks Phillip
