Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] builtin/config: introduce subcommands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

> Hi,
>
> this is the fifth and hopefully last version of my patch sthat
> introduces subcommands into git-config(1).
>
> The only changes compared to v4 are some fixes to commit messages.
> Otherwise I'm not aware of any other feedback that would need to be
> addressed.
>
> Patrick
>
> Patrick Steinhardt (14):
>   config: clarify memory ownership when preparing comment strings
>   builtin/config: move option array around
>   builtin/config: move "fixed-value" option to correct group
>   builtin/config: use `OPT_CMDMODE()` to specify modes
>   builtin/config: pull out function to handle config location
>   builtin/config: pull out function to handle `--null`
>   builtin/config: introduce "list" subcommand
>   builtin/config: introduce "get" subcommand
>   builtin/config: introduce "set" subcommand
>   builtin/config: introduce "unset" subcommand
>   builtin/config: introduce "rename-section" subcommand
>   builtin/config: introduce "remove-section" subcommand
>   builtin/config: introduce "edit" subcommand
>   builtin/config: display subcommand help
>
>  Documentation/git-config.txt | 219 ++++++++-------
>  builtin/config.c             | 512 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  config.c                     |  16 +-
>  config.h                     |   2 +-
>  t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches  |   1 -
>  t/t1300-config.sh            | 432 +++++++++++++++++------------
>  6 files changed, 812 insertions(+), 370 deletions(-)
>
> Range-diff against v4:
>  1:  3aa26d5bff !  1:  881d2b5426 config: clarify memory ownership when preparing comment strings
>     @@ Commit message
>          not like this micro-optimization really matters. Thus, callers are now
>          always responsible for freeing the value.
>
>     +    Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx>
>     +
>       ## builtin/config.c ##
>      @@ builtin/config.c: static struct config_options config_options;
>       static int show_origin;
>  2:  8f0804ab48 =  2:  66dffaa8f2 builtin/config: move option array around
>  3:  ddcd8031d7 !  3:  36abda0e02 builtin/config: move "fixed-value" option to correct group
>     @@ Commit message
>          builtin/config: move "fixed-value" option to correct group
>
>          The `--fixed-value` option can be used to alter how the value-pattern
>     -    parameter is interpreted for the various submodes of git-config(1). But
>     -    while it is an option, it is currently listed as part of the submodes
>     -    group the command, which is wrong.
>     +    parameter is interpreted for the various actions of git-config(1). But
>     +    while it is an option, it is currently listed as part of the actions
>     +    group, which is wrong.
>
>          Move the option to the "Other" group, which hosts the various options
>          known to git-config(1).
>  4:  1bc3918840 =  4:  34b66f9c87 builtin/config: use `OPT_CMDMODE()` to specify modes
>  5:  3754812309 =  5:  4f90f206e7 builtin/config: pull out function to handle config location
>  6:  cb1714c493 =  6:  df1a6f14e6 builtin/config: pull out function to handle `--null`
>  7:  b3f3c3ba6a !  7:  1df76a9970 builtin/config: introduce "list" subcommand
>     @@ Commit message
>          builtin/config: introduce "list" subcommand
>
>          While git-config(1) has several modes, those modes are not exposed with
>     -    subcommands but instead by specifying e.g. `--unset` or `--list`. This
>     -    user interface is not really in line with how our more modern commands
>     -    work, where it is a lot more customary to say e.g. `git remote list`.
>     -    Furthermore, to add to the confusion, git-config(1) also allows the user
>     -    to request modes implicitly by just specifying the correct number of
>     -    arguments. Thus, `git config foo.bar` will retrieve the value of
>     -    "foo.bar" while `git config foo.bar baz` will set it to "baz".
>     +    subcommands but instead by specifying action flags like `--unset` or
>     +    `--list`. This user interface is not really in line with how our more
>     +    modern commands work, where it is a lot more customary to say e.g. `git
>     +    remote list`. Furthermore, to add to the confusion, git-config(1) also
>     +    allows the user to request modes implicitly by just specifying the
>     +    correct number of arguments. Thus, `git config foo.bar` will retrieve
>     +    the value of "foo.bar" while `git config foo.bar baz` will set it to
>     +    "baz".
>
>          Overall, this makes for a confusing interface that could really use a
>          makeover. It hurts discoverability of what you can do with git-config(1)
>  8:  0e6da909ac =  8:  29676b81e0 builtin/config: introduce "get" subcommand
>  9:  8a623a31b9 =  9:  94afb5a5b7 builtin/config: introduce "set" subcommand
> 10:  e25e5b69cd = 10:  e525c2326a builtin/config: introduce "unset" subcommand
> 11:  f24008d356 = 11:  a797889890 builtin/config: introduce "rename-section" subcommand
> 12:  fc2ddd3201 = 12:  8ec214755e builtin/config: introduce "remove-section" subcommand
> 13:  4c2d817eff = 13:  1893c23afc builtin/config: introduce "edit" subcommand
> 14:  4c351b12b8 = 14:  97a48ab81d builtin/config: display subcommand help
>
> base-commit: d4cc1ec35f3bcce816b69986ca41943f6ce21377
> --
> 2.45.0

The range diff looks good. Overall I have nothing more to add to this
series.

Thanks
Karthik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux