Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > But TBH I think this is probably overkill and anybody who encounters an > issue like this likely does not need the extra hand. As long as the replacement is clearly obvious. Is it always the rule that "when the function F you tried to call is missing, just prefix F with refs_ and add the first parameter that is a ref_store, i.e., refs_f(get_main_ref_store(the_repository), ...)"? Even if that were the case, some in-header comment would help the affected topic owners than having nothing at all.
