Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Though maybe an even more radical proposal: now that read_ref_full(), > etc, are gone, and we have only refs_read_ref_full(), could/should we > shorten the latter to drop the "refs_" prefix? I view it as a good longer-term goal. But I also view it as an orthogonal issue to the transition. We need a smooth migration path for remaining callers of these older functions. We could do the USE_THE_INDEX_MACROS like compatibility layer during transition period. Thanks.
