Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] add-patch: do not show UI messages on stderr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rubén

On 29/04/2024 19:37, Rubén Justo wrote:
There is no need to show some UI messages on stderr, and yet doing so
may produce some undesirable results, such as messages appearing in an
unexpected order.

Let's use stdout for all UI messages, and adjusts the tests accordingly.

The test changes in "warn add.interactive.useBultin" show that we still print a warning to stderr, I don't think that particular case is worth worrying about though.

Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  add-patch.c                | 13 ++++++-------
  t/t3701-add-interactive.sh | 12 ++++++------
  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/add-patch.c b/add-patch.c
index 0997d4af73..fc0eed4fd4 100644
--- a/add-patch.c
+++ b/add-patch.c
@@ -293,10 +293,9 @@ static void err(struct add_p_state *s, const char *fmt, ...)
  	va_list args;
va_start(args, fmt);
-	fputs(s->s.error_color, stderr);
-	vfprintf(stderr, fmt, args);
-	fputs(s->s.reset_color, stderr);
-	fputc('\n', stderr);
+	fputs(s->s.error_color, stdout);
+	vprintf(fmt, args);
+	puts(s->s.reset_color);
  	va_end(args);
  }

This looks like a good change

@@ -1326,7 +1325,7 @@ static int apply_for_checkout(struct add_p_state *s, struct strbuf *diff,
  		err(s, _("Nothing was applied.\n"));
  	} else
  		/* As a last resort, show the diff to the user */
-		fwrite(diff->buf, diff->len, 1, stderr);
+		fwrite(diff->buf, diff->len, 1, stdout);

This seems reasonable as we'd print the "Nothing was applied" error message above to stdout now. Anything "git apply" writes to stderr should be flushed when it exits before we print these messages.

return 0;
  }
@@ -1778,9 +1777,9 @@ int run_add_p(struct repository *r, enum add_p_mode mode,
  			break;
if (s.file_diff_nr == 0)
-		fprintf(stderr, _("No changes.\n"));
+		err(&s, _("No changes."));
  	else if (binary_count == s.file_diff_nr)
-		fprintf(stderr, _("Only binary files changed.\n"));
+		err(&s, _("Only binary files changed."));

These two mean we'll now color these messages which we didn't do before. I think if we hit this code we don't print anything else (apart from the warning about add.interactive.useBuiltin being removed) so it probably does not matter whether we use stdout or stderr here and I don't have a strong opinion either way.

Best Wishes

Phillip

  	add_p_state_clear(&s);
  	return 0;
diff --git a/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh b/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh
index 04d8333373..c5531520cb 100755
--- a/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh
+++ b/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh
@@ -45,13 +45,13 @@ test_expect_success 'warn about add.interactive.useBuiltin' '
  	cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
  	warning: the add.interactive.useBuiltin setting has been removed!
  	See its entry in '\''git help config'\'' for details.
-	No changes.
  	EOF
+	echo "No changes." >expect.out &&
for v in = =true =false
  	do
  		git -c "add.interactive.useBuiltin$v" add -p >out 2>actual &&
-		test_must_be_empty out &&
+		test_cmp expect.out out &&
  		test_cmp expect actual || return 1
  	done
  '
@@ -335,13 +335,13 @@ test_expect_success 'different prompts for mode change/deleted' '
test_expect_success 'correct message when there is nothing to do' '
  	git reset --hard &&
-	git add -p 2>err &&
-	test_grep "No changes" err &&
+	git add -p >out &&
+	test_grep "No changes" out &&
  	printf "\\0123" >binary &&
  	git add binary &&
  	printf "\\0abc" >binary &&
-	git add -p 2>err &&
-	test_grep "Only binary files changed" err
+	git add -p >out &&
+	test_grep "Only binary files changed" out
  '
test_expect_success 'setup again' '




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux