Re: [PATCH 0/8] tightening ref handling outside of refs/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 11:28:38AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 04:42:38AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 04:15:13AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > 
> > >   [1/8]: t0600: don't create ref outside of refs/
> > >   [2/8]: t5619: use fully qualified refname for branch
> > 
> > You can probably guess that I found these test cleanups only after
> > writing the rest of the series and seeing them fail. :)
> > 
> > It turns out there is one more spot that is run only with reftables (so
> > CI caught it, but my local testing did not):
> 
> Yeah, that's an issue by itself in my opinion. It's ultimately the
> reason why I change this to always run the backend-specific tests in
> [1].

Ah, I hadn't seen that series. Yes, I'd be very much in favor of that
change.

-Peff




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux