[PATCH 2/3] receive-pack: don't mention successful updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The proposed updates are already shown to the user by
send-pack, so there's no point. We continue to show errors,
since they are unexpected.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
---
 receive-pack.c |    4 ----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/receive-pack.c b/receive-pack.c
index 38e35c0..ed44b89 100644
--- a/receive-pack.c
+++ b/receive-pack.c
@@ -204,8 +204,6 @@ static const char *update(struct command *cmd)
 			error("failed to delete %s", name);
 			return "failed to delete";
 		}
-		fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s -> deleted\n", name,
-			sha1_to_hex(old_sha1));
 		return NULL; /* good */
 	}
 	else {
@@ -217,8 +215,6 @@ static const char *update(struct command *cmd)
 		if (write_ref_sha1(lock, new_sha1, "push")) {
 			return "failed to write"; /* error() already called */
 		}
-		fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s -> %s\n", name,
-			sha1_to_hex(old_sha1), sha1_to_hex(new_sha1));
 		return NULL; /* good */
 	}
 }
-- 
1.5.3.5.1530.g7353

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux