Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: describe the project's decision-making process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> As I said, I do think it is rare for us to start with only "ideas"
> without anything concrete to comment on, and that is why I asked
> some references (e.g., URLs into the archive) to a discussion in the
> past of a larger decisions where (1) something is proposed, (2)
> discussed, and (3) declaration that a consensus has reached, if a
> document describes the status quo.

FYI, what I readily recall was the discussion that started here.

  https://lore.kernel.org/git/20170304011251.GA26789@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

It did have a few iterations and then near the end the consensus has
turned into a "patch" that adds the design document to our history,
but otherwise, it did not involve a "series" level patch reviews.

HTH..




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux