"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I've taken a look, and other than the minor typo I noted, this seems > fine. I'm in favour of getting rid of the SHA-1 default, even though my > gut tells me we might find a bug or two along the way where things > aren't initialized properly. I still think that'll be okay and it's > worth doing, since it'll help us prepare for the case in the future > where we want to switch the default and also for libification, where we > won't want to make those kinds of assumptions. Yup, thanks for reviewing (and thanks Patrick for writing the series).
