Re: [PATCH] format-patch: ensure that --rfc and -k are mutually exclusive
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: Re: [PATCH] format-patch: ensure that --rfc and -k are mutually exclusive
From
: Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:30:26 +0200
Cc
: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gitster@xxxxxxxxx, sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx, ps@xxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
D0NYZ4A0TV6M.CF19YB1PFRSB@cmpwn.com
>
References
: <
71d195c248879e7c46fac0e84c6b0a8aa90bd2c2.1713488563.git.dsimic@manjaro.org
> <
b4c6cbf5f3246ecd0cf27c7e87bf6dfc@manjaro.org
> <
D0NYZ4A0TV6M.CF19YB1PFRSB@cmpwn.com
>
On 2024-04-19 10:51, Drew DeVault wrote:
Reviewed-by: Drew DeVault <sir@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!
References
:
[PATCH] format-patch: ensure that --rfc and -k are mutually exclusive
From:
Dragan Simic
Re: [PATCH] format-patch: ensure that --rfc and -k are mutually exclusive
From:
Dragan Simic
Re: [PATCH] format-patch: ensure that --rfc and -k are mutually exclusive
From:
Drew DeVault
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH] format-patch: ensure that --rfc and -k are mutually exclusive
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] refs: accept symref values in `ref_transaction[_add]_update`
Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCH] format-patch: ensure that --rfc and -k are mutually exclusive
Next by thread:
Re: [PATCH] format-patch: ensure that --rfc and -k are mutually exclusive
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel Development]
[Gcc Help]
[IETF Annouce]
[DCCP]
[Netdev]
[Networking]
[Security]
[V4L]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Fedora Users]