Hi, On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Steffen Prohaska wrote: > On Nov 4, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > ever since the up-to-date check was changed to use just one call to > > "cvs status", a bug was present. Now cvsexportcommit expects "cvs > > status" to return the results in the same order as the file names were > > passed. > > > > This is not true, as I had to realise with one of my projects on > > sourceforge. > > > > Since time is so scarce on my side, I will not have time to fix this > > bug, but will instead return to my old "commit by hand" procedure. > > I introduced this 'optimization', which turned out to be a bug. So, I > feel responsible. Sorry for the trouble. > > In August this was already recognized and a patch submitted: > > http://marc.info/?t=118718458000004&r=1&w=2 > > I do not know why it wasn't applied. I forgot re-checking after my > vacation. It slipped by me, because of holiday, too. (I was on my well needed holiday then.) But that patch really seems like a step back to me. The line "File: ... Status: ..." should be parsable enough to fix the bug properly, instead of undoing the optimisation. AFAICS Robin replied with a "let's see if a proper fix materialises", and I kind of hope that it will materialise soon. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
