Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> With all due respect, "--rfc=WIP" looks like a kludge, simply
> because "--rfc" should, IIUC, be some kind of a fixed shorthand.
I wouldn't use "should" there. In any case, we are not going to add
unbounded number of --wip, --resend, etc., on top of what we have
already. Introducing --something={WIP,RESEND,RFC,HACK,...} and
deprecating --rfc is not something I would object to, though.
Thanks.
