"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> > > In https://github.com/microsoft/git/issues/623, it was reported that > maintenance stops on a missing repository, omitting the remaining > repositories that were scheduled for maintenance. > > This is undesirable, as it should be a best effort type of operation. > > It should still fail due to the missing repository, of course, but not > leave the non-missing repositories in unmaintained shapes. > > Let's use `for-each-repo`'s shiny new `--keep-going` option that we just > introduced for that very purpose. > > This change will be picked up when running `git maintenance start`, > which is run implicitly by `scalar reconfigure`. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> > --- > builtin/gc.c | 7 ++++--- > t/t7900-maintenance.sh | 6 +++--- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Other than the N_("") thing Eric noticed, I didn't find anything glaringly wrong in these two patches. Nicely done. We may want to fold overly long lines we see in the patch, but I'd prefer to see it done as a post-cleanup task (#leftoverbits), as the lines in the preimage of the patch are already overly long. Thanks.
