Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > I had another cursory read of this patch series that relied on the range > diffs for most of the part. In any way, this version looks good to me. > Thanks! Likewise. Let's mark it for 'next'.
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > I had another cursory read of this patch series that relied on the range > diffs for most of the part. In any way, this version looks good to me. > Thanks! Likewise. Let's mark it for 'next'.