Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] SubmittingPatches: clarify 'git-contacts' location

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> An alternative would be to deprecate and/or remove `git-contacts` from
> "contrib" and instead point people at Felipe's `git-related`[1], which
> is the direct parent[2] of `git-contacts`, as well as a more
> functional drop-in replacement for `git-contacts`.

I am not sure it is wise to add an external dependency on a tool
that is not very well known ([1] has only 68 stars), not packaged
for distros [*] and is more or less dormant (the last update was
April last year).

Unless the one we locally carry is vastly inadequate in comparison,
I somehow doubt that it is a better alternative to ask our target
audience to use it, than letting them use git-contacts from in-tree.


[Footnote]

 * "git imerge" and "tig" are what I compare with to use as a
   yardstick, when trying to judge how well-known and easily
   obtainable a package related to us is.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux